Over the past few years, research has witnessed the advancement of deep learning models trained on large datasets, some even encompassing millions of examples. While these impressive performance on their hidden test sets, they often underperform when assessed on external datasets. Recognizing the critical role of generalization in medical AI development, many prestigious journals now require reporting results both on the local hidden test set as well as on external datasets before considering a study for publication. Effectively, the field of medical AI has transitioned from the traditional usage of a single dataset that is split into train and test to a more comprehensive framework using multiple datasets, some of which are used for model development (source domain) and others for testing (target domains). However, this new experimental setting does not necessarily resolve the challenge of generalization. This is because of the variability encountered in intended use and specificities across hospital cultures making the idea of universally generalizable systems a myth. On the other hand, the systematic, and a fortiori recurrent re-calibration, of models at the individual hospital level, although ideal, may be overoptimistic given the legal, regulatory and technical challenges that are involved. Re-calibration using transfer learning may not even be possible in some instances where reference labels of target domains are not available. In this perspective we establish a hierarchical three-level scale system reflecting the generalization level of a medical AI algorithm. This scale better reflects the diversity of real-world medical scenarios per which target domain data for re-calibration of models may or not be available and if it is, may or not have reference labels systematically available.