We simulate behaviour of independent reinforcement learning algorithms playing the Crawford and Sobel (1982) game of strategic information transmission. We show that a sender and a receiver training together converge to strategies close to the exante optimal equilibrium of the game. Hence, communication takes place to the largest extent predicted by Nash equilibrium given the degree of conflict of interest between agents. The conclusion is shown to be robust to alternative specifications of the hyperparameters and of the game. We discuss implications for theories of equilibrium selection in information transmission games, for work on emerging communication among algorithms in computer science and for the economics of collusions in markets populated by artificially intelligent agents.