Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) have gained attention for their energy-efficient machine learning capabilities, utilizing bio-inspired activation functions and sparse binary spike-data representations. While recent SNN algorithmic advances achieve high accuracy on large-scale computer vision tasks, their energy-efficiency claims rely on certain impractical estimation metrics. This work studies two hardware benchmarking platforms for large-scale SNN inference, namely SATA and SpikeSim. SATA is a sparsity-aware systolic-array accelerator, while SpikeSim evaluates SNNs implemented on In-Memory Computing (IMC) based analog crossbars. Using these tools, we find that the actual energy-efficiency improvements of recent SNN algorithmic works differ significantly from their estimated values due to various hardware bottlenecks. We identify and address key roadblocks to efficient SNN deployment on hardware, including repeated computations & data movements over timesteps, neuronal module overhead, and vulnerability of SNNs towards crossbar non-idealities.