In this paper, we present an analytical framework and a novel metric to shed light on the interpretation of the multimodal vision community. Our approach involves measuring the proposed semantic variance and feature similarity across modalities and levels, and conducting semantic and quantitative analyses through comprehensive experiments. Specifically, we investigate the consistency and speciality of representations across modalities, evolution rules within each modality, and the collaboration logic used when optimizing a multi-modality model. Our studies reveal several important findings, such as the discrepancy in cross-modal features and the hybrid multi-modal cooperation rule, which highlights consistency and speciality simultaneously for complementary inference. Through our dissection and findings on multi-modal fusion, we facilitate a rethinking of the reasonability and necessity of popular multi-modal vision fusion strategies. Furthermore, our work lays the foundation for designing a trustworthy and universal multi-modal fusion model for a variety of tasks in the future.