Language models, primarily transformer-based ones, obtained colossal success in NLP. To be more precise, studies like BERT in NLU and works such as GPT-3 for NLG are very crucial. DNA sequences are very close to natural language in terms of structure, so if the DNA-related bioinformatics domain is concerned, discriminative models, like DNABert, exist. Yet, the generative side of the coin is mainly unexplored to the best of our knowledge. Consequently, we focused on developing an autoregressive generative language model like GPT-3 for DNA sequences. Because working with whole DNA sequences is challenging without substantial computational resources, we decided to carry out our study on a smaller scale, focusing on nucleotide sequences of human genes, unique parts in DNA with specific functionalities, instead of the whole DNA. This decision did not change the problem structure a lot due to the fact that both DNA and genes can be seen as 1D sequences consisting of four different nucleotides without losing much information and making too much simplification. First of all, we systematically examined an almost entirely unexplored problem and observed that RNNs performed the best while simple techniques like N-grams were also promising. Another beneficial point was learning how to work with generative models on languages we do not understand, unlike natural language. How essential using real-life tasks beyond the classical metrics such as perplexity is observed. Furthermore, checking whether the data-hungry nature of these models can be changed through selecting a language with minimal vocabulary size, four owing to four different types of nucleotides, is examined. The reason for reviewing this was that choosing such a language might make the problem easier. However, what we observed in this study was it did not provide that much of a change in the amount of data needed.