As intelligent trading agents based on reinforcement learning (RL) gain prevalence, it becomes more important to ensure that RL agents obey laws, regulations, and human behavioral expectations. There is substantial literature concerning the aversion of obvious catastrophes like crashing a helicopter or bankrupting a trading account, but little around the avoidance of subtle non-normative behavior for which there are examples, but no programmable definition. Such behavior may violate legal or regulatory, rather than physical or monetary, constraints. In this article, I consider a series of experiments in which an intelligent stock trading agent maximizes profit but may also inadvertently learn to spoof the market in which it participates. I first inject a hand-coded spoofing agent to a multi-agent market simulation and learn to recognize spoofing activity sequences. Then I replace the hand-coded spoofing trader with a simple profit-maximizing RL agent and observe that it independently discovers spoofing as the optimal strategy. Finally, I introduce a method to incorporate the recognizer as normative guide, shaping the agent's perceived rewards and altering its selected actions. The agent remains profitable while avoiding spoofing behaviors that would result in even higher profit. After presenting the empirical results, I conclude with some recommendations. The method should generalize to the reduction of any unwanted behavior for which a recognizer can be learned.