Classical planning representation languages based on first-order logic have been extensively used to model and solve planning problems, but they struggle to capture implicit preconditions and effects that arise in complex planning scenarios. To address this problem, we propose an alternative approach to representing and transforming world states during planning. Based on the category-theoretic concepts of $\mathsf{C}$-sets and double-pushout rewriting (DPO), our proposed representation can effectively handle structured knowledge about world states that support domain abstractions at all levels. It formalizes the semantics of predicates according to a user-provided ontology and preserves the semantics when transitioning between world states. This method provides a formal semantics for using knowledge graphs and relational databases to model world states and updates in planning. In this paper, we compare our category-theoretic representation with the classical planning representation. We show that our proposed representation has advantages over the classical representation in terms of handling implicit preconditions and effects, and provides a more structured framework in which to model and solve planning problems.