Knowledge graph embedding models (KGEMs) are used for various tasks related to knowledge graphs (KGs), including link prediction. They are trained with loss functions that are computed considering a batch of scored triples and their corresponding labels. Traditional approaches consider the label of a triple to be either true or false. However, recent works suggest that all negative triples should not be valued equally. In line with this commonly adopted assumption, we posit that semantically valid negative triples might be high-quality negative triples. As such, loss functions should treat them differently from semantically invalid negative ones. To this aim, we propose semantic-driven versions for the three mostly used loss functions for link prediction. In particular, we treat the scores of negative triples differently by injecting background knowledge about relation domains and ranges into the loss functions. In an extensive and controlled experimental setting, we show that the proposed loss functions systematically provide satisfying results on three public benchmark KGs underpinned with different schemas, which demonstrates both the generality and superiority of our proposed approach. In fact, the proposed loss functions do not only lead to better MRR and Hits@10 values, but also drive KGEMs towards better semantic awareness. This highlights that semantic information globally improves KGEMs, and thus should be incorporated into loss functions whenever such information is available.