Surrogate safety measures in the form of conflict indicators are indispensable components of the proactive traffic safety toolbox. Conflict indicators can be classified into past-trajectory-based conflicts and predicted-trajectory-based conflicts. While the calculation of the former class of conflicts is deterministic and unambiguous, the latter category is computed using predicted vehicle trajectories and is thus more stochastic. Consequently, the accuracy of prediction-based conflicts is contingent on the accuracy of the utilized trajectory prediction algorithm. Trajectory prediction can be a challenging task, particularly at intersections where vehicle maneuvers are diverse. Furthermore, due to limitations relating to the road user trajectory extraction pipelines, accurate geometric representation of vehicles during conflict analysis is a challenging task. Misrepresented geometries distort the real distances between vehicles under observation. In this research, a prediction-based conflict identification methodology was proposed. A sequence-to-sequence Recurrent Neural Network was developed to sequentially predict future vehicle trajectories for up to 3 seconds ahead. Furthermore, the proposed network was trained using the CitySim Dataset to forecast both future vehicle positions and headings to facilitate the prediction of future bounding boxes, thus maintaining accurate vehicle geometric representations. It was experimentally determined that the proposed method outperformed frequently used trajectory prediction models for conflict analysis at intersections. A comparison between Time-to-Collision (TTC) conflict identification using vehicle bounding boxes versus the commonly used vehicle center points for geometric representation was conducted. Compared to the bounding box method, the center point approach often failed to identify TTC conflicts or underestimated their severity.