Causal reasoning has an indispensable role in how humans make sense of the world and come to decisions in everyday life. While $20th$ century science was reserved from making causal claims as too strong and not achievable, the $21st$ century is marked by the return of causality encouraged by the mathematization of causal notions and the introduction of the non-deterministic concept of cause~\cite{illari2011look}. Besides its common use cases in epidemiology, political, and social sciences, causality turns out to be crucial in evaluating the fairness of automated decisions, both in a legal and everyday sense. We provide arguments and examples of why causality is particularly important for fairness evaluation. In particular, we point out the social impact of non-causal predictions and the legal anti-discrimination process that relies on causal claims. We conclude with a discussion about the challenges and limitations of applying causality in practical scenarios as well as possible solutions.