Personalized Federated Learning (pFL) has gained increasing attention in recent years due to its success in handling the statistical heterogeneity of FL clients via utilizing and deploying distinct local models. However, standardized evaluation and systematical analysis of diverse pFL methods remain a challenge. Firstly, the highly varied datasets, FL simulation settings and pFL implementations impede the fast and fair pFL comparison. Secondly, the effectiveness and robustness of pFL methods are under-explored in various practical scenarios, such as new clients generalization and resource-limited clients participation. Finally, the current pFL literature diverges in the adopted evaluation and ablation protocols. To tackle these challenges, we propose the first comprehensive pFL benchmark, pFL-Bench, for facilitating rapid, reproducible, standardized and thorough pFL evaluation. The proposed benchmark contains 9 datasets in diverse application domains with unified data partition and realistic heterogeneous settings; a modular and easy-to-extend pFL codebase with more than 20 competitive pFL baseline implementations; and systematic evaluations under containerized environments in terms of generalization, fairness, system overhead, and convergence. We highlight the benefits and potential of SOTA pFL methods and hope pFL-Bench enables further pFL research and broad applications that would otherwise be difficult owing to the absence of a dedicated benchmark. The code is released at https://github.com/alibaba/FederatedScope/tree/master/benchmark/pFL-Bench.