Modularity is essential to many well-performing structured systems, as it is a useful means of managing complexity [8]. An analysis of modularity in neural networks produced by machine learning algorithms can offer valuable insight into the workings of such algorithms and how modularity can be leveraged to improve performance. However, this property is often overlooked in the neuroevolutionary literature, so the modular nature of many learning algorithms is unknown. This property was assessed on the popular algorithm "NeuroEvolution of Augmenting Topologies" (NEAT) for standard simulation benchmark control problems due to NEAT's ability to optimise network topology. This paper shows that NEAT networks seem to rapidly increase in modularity over time with the rate and convergence dependent on the problem. Interestingly, NEAT tends towards increasingly modular networks even when network fitness converges. It was shown that the ideal level of network modularity in the explored parameter space is highly dependent on other network variables, dispelling theories that modularity has a straightforward relationship to network performance. This is further proven in this paper by demonstrating that rewarding modularity directly did not improve fitness.