The local reference frame (LRF), as an independent coordinate system generated on a local 3D surface, is widely used in 3D local feature descriptor construction and 3D transformation estimation which are two key steps in the local method-based surface matching. There are numerous LRF methods have been proposed in literatures. In these methods, the x- and z-axis are commonly generated by different methods or strategies, and some x-axis methods are implemented on the basis of a z-axis being given. In addition, the weight and disambiguation methods are commonly used in these LRF methods. In existing evaluations of LRF, each LRF method is evaluated with a complete form. However, the merits and demerits of the z-axis, x-axis, weight and disambiguation methods in LRF construction are unclear. In this paper, we comprehensively analyze the z-axis, x-axis, weight and disambiguation methods in existing LRFs, and obtain six z-axis and eight x-axis, five weight and two disambiguation methods. The performance of these methods are comprehensively evaluated on six standard datasets with different application scenarios and nuisances. Considering the evaluation outcomes, the merits and demerits of different weight, disambiguation, z- and x-axis methods are analyzed and summarized. The experimental result also shows that some new designed LRF axes present superior performance compared with the state-of-the-art ones.