To build a shared perception of the world, humans rely on the ability to resolve misunderstandings by requesting and accepting clarifications. However, when evaluating visiolinguistic models, metrics such as accuracy enforce the assumption that a decision must be made based on a single piece of evidence. In this work, we relax this assumption for the task of referring expression comprehension by allowing the model to request help when its confidence is low. We consider two ways in which this help can be provided: multimodal re-query, where the user is allowed to point or click to provide additional information to the model, and rephrase re-query, where the user is only allowed to provide another referring expression. We demonstrate the importance of re-query by showing that providing the best referring expression for all objects can increase accuracy by up to 21.9% and that this accuracy can be matched by re-querying only 12% of initial referring expressions. We further evaluate re-query functions for both multimodal and rephrase re-query across three modern approaches and demonstrate combined replacement for rephrase re-query, which improves average single-query performance by up to 6.5% and converges to as close as 1.6% of the upper bound of single-query performance.