Estimating how well a machine learning model performs during inference is critical in a variety of scenarios (for example, to quantify uncertainty, or to choose from a library of available models). However, the standard accuracy estimate of softmax confidence is not versatile and cannot reliably predict different performance metrics (e.g., F1-score, recall) or the performance in different application scenarios or input domains. In this work, we systematically generalize performance estimation to a diverse set of metrics and scenarios and discuss generalized notions of uncertainty calibration. We propose the use of post-hoc models to accomplish this goal and investigate design parameters, including the model type, feature engineering, and performance metric, to achieve the best estimation quality. Emphasis is given to object detection problems and, unlike prior work, our approach enables the estimation of per-image metrics such as recall and F1-score. Through extensive experiments with computer vision models and datasets in three use cases -- mobile edge offloading, model selection, and dataset shift -- we find that proposed post-hoc models consistently outperform the standard calibrated confidence baselines. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to develop a unified framework to address different performance estimation problems for machine learning inference.