Objective evaluation (OE) is essential to artificial music, but it's often very hard to determine the quality of OEs. Hitherto, subjective evaluation (SE) remains reliable and prevailing but suffers inevitable disadvantages that OEs may overcome. Therefore, a meta-evaluation system is necessary for designers to test the effectiveness of OEs. In this paper, we present Armor, a complex and cross-domain benchmark dataset that serves for this purpose. Since OEs should correlate with human judgment, we provide music as test cases for OEs and human judgment scores as touchstones. We also provide two meta-evaluation scenarios and their corresponding testing methods to assess the effectiveness of OEs. To the best of our knowledge, Armor is the first comprehensive and rigorous framework that future works could follow, take example by, and improve upon for the task of evaluating computer-generated music and the field of computational music as a whole. By analyzing different OE methods on our dataset, we observe that there is still a huge gap between SE and OE, meaning that hard-coded algorithms are far from catching human's judgment to the music.