We present first speech recognition systems for the two severely under-resourced Malian languages Bambara and Maasina Fulfulde. These systems will be used by the United Nations as part of a monitoring system to inform and support humanitarian programmes in rural Africa. We have compiled datasets in Bambara and Maasina Fulfulde, but since these are very small, we take advantage of six similarly under-resourced datasets in other languages for multilingual training. We focus specifically on the best composition of the multilingual pool of speech data for multilingual training. We find that, although maximising the training pool by including all six additional languages provides improved speech recognition in both target languages, substantially better performance can be achieved by a more judicious choice. Our experiments show that the addition of just one language provides best performance. For Bambara, this additional language is Maasina Fulfulde, and its introduction leads to a relative word error rate reduction of 6.7%, as opposed to a 2.4% relative reduction achieved when pooling all six additional languages. For the case of Maasina Fulfulde, best performance was achieved when adding only Luganda, leading to a relative word error rate improvement of 9.4% as opposed to a 3.9% relative improvement when pooling all six languages. We conclude that careful selection of the out-of-language data is worthwhile for multilingual training even in highly under-resourced settings, and that the general assumption that more data is better does not always hold.