Recent years have seen increasing popularity of logic-based reasoning systems, with research and industrial interest as well as many flourishing applications in the area of Knowledge Graphs. Despite that, one can observe a substantial lack of specific tools able to generate nontrivial reasoning settings and benchmark scenarios. As a consequence, evaluating, analysing and comparing reasoning systems is a complex task, especially when they embody sophisticated optimizations and execution techniques that leverage the theoretical underpinnings of the adopted logic fragment. In this paper, we aim at filling this gap by introducing iWarded, a system that can generate very large, complex, realistic reasoning settings to be used for the benchmarking of logic-based reasoning systems adopting Datalog+/-, a family of extensions of Datalog that has seen a resurgence in the last few years. In particular, iWarded generates reasoning settings for Warded Datalog+/-, a language with a very good tradeoff between computational complexity and expressive power. In the paper, we present the iWarded system and a set of novel theoretical results adopted to generate effective scenarios. As Datalog-based languages are of general interest and see increasing adoption, we believe that iWarded is a step forward in the empirical evaluation of current and future systems.