While hyperparameter optimization (HPO) is known to greatly impact learning algorithm performance, it is often treated as an empirical afterthought. Recent empirical works have highlighted the risk of this second-rate treatment of HPO. They show that inconsistent performance results, based on choice of hyperparameter subspace to search, are a widespread problem in ML research. When comparing two algorithms, J and K searching one subspace can yield the conclusion that J outperforms K, whereas searching another can entail the opposite result. In short, your choice of hyperparameters can deceive you. We provide a theoretical complement to this prior work: We analytically characterize this problem, which we term hyperparameter deception, and show that grid search is inherently deceptive. We prove a defense with guarantees against deception, and demonstrate a defense in practice.