Objective. Epidemiological studies require data that are in alignment with the classifications established for occupations or economic activities. The classifications usually include hundreds of codes and titles. Manual coding of raw data may result in misclassification and be time consuming. The goal was to develop and test a web-tool, named Procode, for coding of free-texts against classifications and recoding between different classifications. Methods. Three text classifiers, i.e. Complement Naive Bayes (CNB), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forest Classifier (RFC), were investigated using a k-fold cross-validation. 30 000 free-texts with manually assigned classification codes of French classification of occupations (PCS) and French classification of activities (NAF) were available. For recoding, Procode integrated a workflow that converts codes of one classification to another according to existing crosswalks. Since this is a straightforward operation, only the recoding time was measured. Results. Among the three investigated text classifiers, CNB resulted in the best performance, where the classifier predicted accurately 57-81% and 63-83% classification codes for PCS and NAF, respectively. SVM lead to somewhat lower results (by 1-2%), while RFC coded accurately up to 30% of the data. The coding operation required one minute per 10 000 records, while the recoding was faster, i.e. 5-10 seconds. Conclusion. The algorithm integrated in Procode showed satisfactory performance, since the tool had to assign the right code by choosing between 500-700 different choices. Based on the results, the authors decided to implement CNB in Procode. In future, if another classifier shows a superior performance, an update will include the required modifications.