Get our free extension to see links to code for papers anywhere online!

Chrome logo Add to Chrome

Firefox logo Add to Firefox


How Interpretable and Trustworthy are GAMs?

Jun 11, 2020
Chun-Hao Chang, Sarah Tan, Ben Lengerich, Anna Goldenberg, Rich Caruana


Share this with someone who'll enjoy it:


Generalized additive models (GAMs) have become a leading model class for data bias discovery and model auditing. However, there are a variety of algorithms for training GAMs, and these do not always learn the same things. Statisticians originally used splines to train GAMs, but more recently GAMs are being trained with boosted decision trees. It is unclear which GAM model(s) to believe, particularly when their explanations are contradictory. In this paper, we investigate a variety of different GAM algorithms both qualitatively and quantitatively on real and simulated datasets. Our results suggest that inductive bias plays a crucial role in model explanations and tree-based GAMs are to be recommended for the kinds of problems and dataset sizes we worked with.



   Access Paper Source



Share this with someone who'll enjoy it: