Generalization Performance of Deep Learning models trained using the Empirical Risk Minimization can be improved significantly by using Data Augmentation strategies such as simple transformations, or using Mixed Samples. In this work, we attempt to empirically analyse the impact of such augmentation strategies on the transfer of generalization between teacher and student models in a distillation setup. We observe that if a teacher is trained using any of the mixed sample augmentation strategies, the student model distilled from it is impaired in its generalization capabilities. We hypothesize that such strategies limit a model's capability to learn example-specific features, leading to a loss in quality of the supervision signal during distillation, without impacting it's standalone prediction performance. We present a novel KL-Divergence based metric to quantitatively measure the generalization capacity of the different networks.