There is no generally agreed upon definition of disentangled representation. Intuitively, the data is generated by a few factors of variation, which are captured and separated in a disentangled representation. Disentangled representations are useful for many tasks such as reinforcement learning, transfer learning, and zero-shot learning. However, the absence of a formally accepted definition makes it difficult to evaluate algorithms for learning disentangled representations. Recently, important steps have been taken towards evaluating disentangled representations: the existing metrics of disentanglement were compared through an experimental study and a framework for the quantitative evaluation of disentangled representations was proposed. However, theoretical guarantees for existing metrics of disentanglement are still missing. In this paper, we analyze metrics of disentanglement and their properties. Specifically, we analyze if the metrics satisfy two desirable properties: (1)~give a high score to representations that are disentangled according to the definition; and (2)~give a low score to representations that are entangled according to the definition. We show that most of the current metrics do not satisfy at least one of these properties. Consequently, we propose a new definition for a metric of disentanglement that satisfies both of the properties.