Truth or Backpropaganda? An Empirical Investigation of Deep Learning Theory

We empirically evaluate common assumptions about neural networks that are widely held by practitioners and theorists alike. We study the prevalence of local minima in loss landscapes, whether small-norm parameter vectors generalize better (and whether this explains the advantages of weight decay), whether wide-network theories (like the neural tangent kernel) describe the behaviors of classifiers, and whether the rank of weight matrices can be linked to generalization and robustness in real-world networks.