Get our free extension to see links to code for papers anywhere online!

Chrome logo Add to Chrome

Firefox logo Add to Firefox

Effect of secular trend in drug effectiveness study in real world data

Aug 18, 2018
Sharon Hensley Alford, Piyush Madan, Shilpa Mahatma, Italo Buleje, Yanyan Han, Fang Lu

Share this with someone who'll enjoy it:

We discovered secular trend bias in a drug effectiveness study for a recently approved drug. We compared treatment outcomes between patients who received the newly approved drug and patients exposed to the standard treatment. All patients diagnosed after the new drug's approval date were considered. We built a machine learning causal inference model to determine patient subpopulations likely to respond better to the newly approved drug. After identifying the presence of secular trend bias in our data, we attempted to adjust for the bias in two different ways. First, we matched patients on the number of days from the new drug's approval date that the patient's treatment (new or standard) began. Second, we included a covariate in the model for the number of days between the date of approval of the new drug and the treatment (new or standard) start date. Neither approach completely mitigated the bias. Residual bias we attribute to differences in patient disease severity or other unmeasured patient characteristics. Had we not identified the secular trend bias in our data, the causal inference model would have been interpreted without consideration for this underlying bias. Being aware of, testing for, and handling potential bias in the data is essential to diminish the uncertainty in AI modeling.

* Presented at 7th Causal Inference Workshop at Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI) Conference 2018 

   Access Paper Source

Share this with someone who'll enjoy it: