Get our free extension to see links to code for papers anywhere online!

Chrome logo  Add to Chrome

Firefox logo Add to Firefox

Measuring the Similarity of Sentential Arguments in Dialog

Sep 06, 2017
Amita Misra, Brian Ecker, Marilyn A. Walker

Share this with someone who'll enjoy it:

When people converse about social or political topics, similar arguments are often paraphrased by different speakers, across many different conversations. Debate websites produce curated summaries of arguments on such topics; these summaries typically consist of lists of sentences that represent frequently paraphrased propositions, or labels capturing the essence of one particular aspect of an argument, e.g. Morality or Second Amendment. We call these frequently paraphrased propositions ARGUMENT FACETS. Like these curated sites, our goal is to induce and identify argument facets across multiple conversations, and produce summaries. However, we aim to do this automatically. We frame the problem as consisting of two steps: we first extract sentences that express an argument from raw social media dialogs, and then rank the extracted arguments in terms of their similarity to one another. Sets of similar arguments are used to represent argument facets. We show here that we can predict ARGUMENT FACET SIMILARITY with a correlation averaging 0.63 compared to a human topline averaging 0.68 over three debate topics, easily beating several reasonable baselines.

* Measuring the Similarity of Sentential Arguments in Dialog, by Misra, Amita and Ecker, Brian and Walker, Marilyn A, 17th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue, pages={276}, year={2016} The dataset is available at 

   Access Paper Source

Share this with someone who'll enjoy it: