Although a great methodological effort has been invested in proposing competitive solutions to the class-imbalance problem, little effort has been made in pursuing a theoretical understanding of this matter. In order to shed some light on this topic, we perform, through a novel framework, an exhaustive analysis of the adequateness of the most commonly used performance scores to assess this complex scenario. We conclude that using unweighted H\"older means with exponent $p \leq 1$ to average the recalls of all the classes produces adequate scores which are capable of determining whether a classifier is competitive. Then, we review the major solutions presented in the class-imbalance literature. Since any learning task can be defined as an optimisation problem where a loss function, usually connected to a particular score, is minimised, our goal, here, is to find whether the learning tasks found in the literature are also oriented to maximise the previously detected adequate scores. We conclude that they usually maximise the unweighted H\"older mean with $p = 1$ (a-mean). Finally, we provide bounds on the values of the studied performance scores which guarantee a classifier with a higher recall than the random classifier in each and every class.