Alert button

Simulation of an Optional Strategy in the Prisoner's Dilemma in Spatial and Non-spatial Environments

Aug 17, 2016
Marcos Cardinot, Maud Gibbons, Colm O'Riordan, Josephine Griffith

Figure 1 for Simulation of an Optional Strategy in the Prisoner's Dilemma in Spatial and Non-spatial Environments
Figure 2 for Simulation of an Optional Strategy in the Prisoner's Dilemma in Spatial and Non-spatial Environments
Figure 3 for Simulation of an Optional Strategy in the Prisoner's Dilemma in Spatial and Non-spatial Environments
Figure 4 for Simulation of an Optional Strategy in the Prisoner's Dilemma in Spatial and Non-spatial Environments

Share this with someone who'll enjoy it:

This paper presents research comparing the effects of different environments on the outcome of an extended Prisoner's Dilemma, in which agents have the option to abstain from playing the game. We consider three different pure strategies: cooperation, defection and abstinence. We adopt an evolutionary game theoretic approach and consider two different environments: the first which imposes no spatial constraints and the second in which agents are placed on a lattice grid. We analyse the performance of the three strategies as we vary the loner's payoff in both structured and unstructured environments. Furthermore we also present the results of simulations which identify scenarios in which cooperative clusters of agents emerge and persist in both environments.

* From Animals to Animats 14 (pp. 145-156). Springer International Publishing, 2016  * 12 pages, 8 figures. International Conference on the Simulation of Adaptive Behavior  
View paper onarxiv icon

Share this with someone who'll enjoy it: