Alert button
Picture for Michael Noseworthy

Michael Noseworthy

Alert button

Bayes3D: fast learning and inference in structured generative models of 3D objects and scenes

Dec 14, 2023
Nishad Gothoskar, Matin Ghavami, Eric Li, Aidan Curtis, Michael Noseworthy, Karen Chung, Brian Patton, William T. Freeman, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Mirko Klukas, Vikash K. Mansinghka

Viaarxiv icon

Structured Latent Variable Models for Articulated Object Interaction

May 26, 2023
Emily Liu, Michael Noseworthy, Nicholas Roy

Figure 1 for Structured Latent Variable Models for Articulated Object Interaction
Figure 2 for Structured Latent Variable Models for Articulated Object Interaction
Figure 3 for Structured Latent Variable Models for Articulated Object Interaction
Figure 4 for Structured Latent Variable Models for Articulated Object Interaction
Viaarxiv icon

Queer In AI: A Case Study in Community-Led Participatory AI

Apr 10, 2023
Organizers Of Queer in AI, Anaelia Ovalle, Arjun Subramonian, Ashwin Singh, Claas Voelcker, Danica J. Sutherland, Davide Locatelli, Eva Breznik, Filip Klubička, Hang Yuan, Hetvi J, Huan Zhang, Jaidev Shriram, Kruno Lehman, Luca Soldaini, Maarten Sap, Marc Peter Deisenroth, Maria Leonor Pacheco, Maria Ryskina, Martin Mundt, Milind Agarwal, Nyx McLean, Pan Xu, A Pranav, Raj Korpan, Ruchira Ray, Sarah Mathew, Sarthak Arora, St John, Tanvi Anand, Vishakha Agrawal, William Agnew, Yanan Long, Zijie J. Wang, Zeerak Talat, Avijit Ghosh, Nathaniel Dennler, Michael Noseworthy, Sharvani Jha, Emi Baylor, Aditya Joshi, Natalia Y. Bilenko, Andrew McNamara, Raphael Gontijo-Lopes, Alex Markham, Evyn Dǒng, Jackie Kay, Manu Saraswat, Nikhil Vytla, Luke Stark

Figure 1 for Queer In AI: A Case Study in Community-Led Participatory AI
Figure 2 for Queer In AI: A Case Study in Community-Led Participatory AI
Figure 3 for Queer In AI: A Case Study in Community-Led Participatory AI
Figure 4 for Queer In AI: A Case Study in Community-Led Participatory AI
Viaarxiv icon

Artificial Intelligence Nomenclature Identified From Delphi Study on Key Issues Related to Trust and Barriers to Adoption for Autonomous Systems

Oct 14, 2022
Thomas E. Doyle, Victoria Tucci, Calvin Zhu, Yifei Zhang, Basem Yassa, Sajjad Rashidiani, Md Asif Khan, Reza Samavi, Michael Noseworthy, Steven Yule

Viaarxiv icon

Active Learning of Abstract Plan Feasibility

Jul 01, 2021
Michael Noseworthy, Caris Moses, Isaiah Brand, Sebastian Castro, Leslie Kaelbling, Tomás Lozano-Pérez, Nicholas Roy

Figure 1 for Active Learning of Abstract Plan Feasibility
Figure 2 for Active Learning of Abstract Plan Feasibility
Figure 3 for Active Learning of Abstract Plan Feasibility
Figure 4 for Active Learning of Abstract Plan Feasibility
Viaarxiv icon

Visual Prediction of Priors for Articulated Object Interaction

Jun 06, 2020
Caris Moses, Michael Noseworthy, Leslie Pack Kaelbling, Tomás Lozano-Pérez, Nicholas Roy

Figure 1 for Visual Prediction of Priors for Articulated Object Interaction
Figure 2 for Visual Prediction of Priors for Articulated Object Interaction
Figure 3 for Visual Prediction of Priors for Articulated Object Interaction
Figure 4 for Visual Prediction of Priors for Articulated Object Interaction
Viaarxiv icon

The RLLChatbot: a solution to the ConvAI challenge

Nov 08, 2018
Nicolas Gontier, Koustuv Sinha, Peter Henderson, Iulian Serban, Michael Noseworthy, Prasanna Parthasarathi, Joelle Pineau

Figure 1 for The RLLChatbot: a solution to the ConvAI challenge
Figure 2 for The RLLChatbot: a solution to the ConvAI challenge
Figure 3 for The RLLChatbot: a solution to the ConvAI challenge
Figure 4 for The RLLChatbot: a solution to the ConvAI challenge
Viaarxiv icon

Towards an Automatic Turing Test: Learning to Evaluate Dialogue Responses

Jan 16, 2018
Ryan Lowe, Michael Noseworthy, Iulian V. Serban, Nicolas Angelard-Gontier, Yoshua Bengio, Joelle Pineau

Figure 1 for Towards an Automatic Turing Test: Learning to Evaluate Dialogue Responses
Figure 2 for Towards an Automatic Turing Test: Learning to Evaluate Dialogue Responses
Figure 3 for Towards an Automatic Turing Test: Learning to Evaluate Dialogue Responses
Figure 4 for Towards an Automatic Turing Test: Learning to Evaluate Dialogue Responses
Viaarxiv icon

How NOT To Evaluate Your Dialogue System: An Empirical Study of Unsupervised Evaluation Metrics for Dialogue Response Generation

Jan 03, 2017
Chia-Wei Liu, Ryan Lowe, Iulian V. Serban, Michael Noseworthy, Laurent Charlin, Joelle Pineau

Figure 1 for How NOT To Evaluate Your Dialogue System: An Empirical Study of Unsupervised Evaluation Metrics for Dialogue Response Generation
Figure 2 for How NOT To Evaluate Your Dialogue System: An Empirical Study of Unsupervised Evaluation Metrics for Dialogue Response Generation
Figure 3 for How NOT To Evaluate Your Dialogue System: An Empirical Study of Unsupervised Evaluation Metrics for Dialogue Response Generation
Figure 4 for How NOT To Evaluate Your Dialogue System: An Empirical Study of Unsupervised Evaluation Metrics for Dialogue Response Generation
Viaarxiv icon