Sparse Contrastive Learning for Content-Based Cold Item Recommendation

Item cold-start is a pervasive challenge for collaborative filtering (CF) recommender systems. Existing methods often train cold-start models by mapping auxiliary item content, such as images or text descriptions, into the embedding space of a CF model. However, such approaches can be limited by the fundamental information gap between CF signals and content features. In this work, we propose to avoid this limitation with purely content-based modeling of cold items, i.e. without alignment with CF user or item embeddings. We instead frame cold-start prediction in terms of item-item similarity, training a content encoder to project into a latent space where similarity correlates with user preferences. We define our training objective as a sparse generalization of sampled softmax loss with the $α$-entmax family of activation functions, which allows for sharper estimation of item relevance by zeroing gradients for uninformative negatives. We then describe how this Sampled Entmax for Cold-start (SEMCo) training regime can be extended via knowledge distillation, and show that it outperforms existing cold-start methods and standard sampled softmax in ranking accuracy. We also discuss the advantages of purely content-based modeling, particularly in terms of equity of item outcomes.

Efficient Retrieval Scaling with Hierarchical Indexing for Large Scale Recommendation

The increase in data volume, computational resources, and model parameters during training has led to the development of numerous large-scale industrial retrieval models for recommendation tasks. However, effectively and efficiently deploying these large-scale foundational retrieval models remains a critical challenge that has not been fully addressed. Common quick-win solutions for deploying these massive models include relying on offline computations (such as cached user dictionaries) or distilling large models into smaller ones. Yet, both approaches fall short of fully leveraging the representational and inference capabilities of foundational models. In this paper, we explore whether it is possible to learn a hierarchical organization over the memory of foundational retrieval models. Such a hierarchical structure would enable more efficient search by reducing retrieval costs while preserving exactness. To achieve this, we propose jointly learning a hierarchical index using cross-attention and residual quantization for large-scale retrieval models. We also present its real-world deployment at Meta, supporting daily advertisement recommendations for billions of Facebook and Instagram users. Interestingly, we discovered that the intermediate nodes in the learned index correspond to a small set of high-quality data. Fine-tuning the model on this set further improves inference performance, and concretize the concept of "test-time training" within the recommendation system domain. We demonstrate these findings using both internal and public datasets with strong baseline comparisons and hope they contribute to the community's efforts in developing the next generation of foundational retrieval models.

Is Sliding Window All You Need? An Open Framework for Long-Sequence Recommendation

Long interaction histories are central to modern recommender systems, yet training with long sequences is often dismissed as impractical under realistic memory and latency budgets. This work demonstrates that it is not only practical but also effective-at academic scale. We release a complete, end-to-end framework that implements industrial-style long-sequence training with sliding windows, including all data processing, training, and evaluation scripts. Beyond reproducing prior gains, we contribute two capabilities missing from earlier reports: (i) a runtime-aware ablation study that quantifies the accuracy-compute frontier across windowing regimes and strides, and (ii) a novel k-shift embedding layer that enables million-scale vocabularies on commodity GPUs with negligible accuracy loss. Our implementation trains reliably on modest university clusters while delivering competitive retrieval quality (e.g., up to +6.04% MRR and +6.34% Recall@10 on Retailrocket) with $\sim 4 \times $ training-time overheads. By packaging a robust pipeline, reporting training time costs, and introducing an embedding mechanism tailored for low-resource settings, we transform long-sequence training from a closed, industrial technique into a practical, open, and extensible methodology for the community.

Identifying and Mitigating Gender Cues in Academic Recommendation Letters: An Interpretability Case Study

Letters of recommendation (LoRs) can carry patterns of implicitly gendered language that can inadvertently influence downstream decisions, e.g. in hiring and admissions. In this work, we investigate the extent to which Transformer-based encoder models as well as Large Language Models (LLMs) can infer the gender of applicants in academic LoRs submitted to an U.S. medical-residency program after explicit identifiers like names and pronouns are de-gendered. While using three models (DistilBERT, RoBERTa, and Llama 2) to classify the gender of anonymized and de-gendered LoRs, significant gender leakage was observed as evident from up to 68% classification accuracy. Text interpretation methods, like TF-IDF and SHAP, demonstrate that certain linguistic patterns are strong proxies for gender, e.g. "emotional'' and "humanitarian'' are commonly associated with LoRs from female applicants. As an experiment in creating truly gender-neutral LoRs, these implicit gender cues were remove resulting in a drop of up to 5.5% accuracy and 2.7% macro $F_1$ score on re-training the classifiers. However, applicant gender prediction still remains better than chance. In this case study, our findings highlight that 1) LoRs contain gender-identifying cues that are hard to remove and may activate bias in decision-making and 2) while our technical framework may be a concrete step toward fairer academic and professional evaluations, future work is needed to interrogate the role that gender plays in LoR review. Taken together, our findings motivate upstream auditing of evaluative text in real-world academic letters of recommendation as a necessary complement to model-level fairness interventions.

UniRec: Bridging the Expressive Gap between Generative and Discriminative Recommendation via Chain-of-Attribute

Generative Recommendation (GR) reframes retrieval and ranking as autoregressive decoding over Semantic IDs (SIDs), unifying the multi-stage pipeline into a single model. Yet a fundamental expressive gap persists: discriminative models score items with direct feature access, enabling explicit user-item crossing, whereas GR decodes over compact SID tokens without item-side signal. We formalize this via Bayes' theorem, showing ranking by p(y|f,u) is equivalent to ranking by p(f|y,u), which factorizes autoregressively over item features. This establishes that a generative model with full feature access is as expressive as its discriminative counterpart; any practical gap stems solely from incomplete feature coverage. We propose UniRec with Chain-of-Attribute (CoA) as its core mechanism. CoA prefixes each SID sequence with structured attribute tokens--category, seller, brand--before decoding the SID itself, recovering the item-side feature crossing that discriminative models exploit. Because items sharing identical attributes cluster in adjacent SID regions, attribute conditioning yields a measurable per-step entropy reduction H(s_k|s_{<k},a) < H(s_k|s_{<k}), narrowing the search space and stabilizing beam search trajectories. We further address two deployment challenges: Capacity-constrained SID introduces exposure-weighted capacity penalties into residual quantization to suppress token collapse and the Matthew effect across SID layers; Conditional Decoding Context (CDC) combines Task-Conditioned BOS with hash-based Content Summaries, injecting scenario-conditioned signals at each decoding step. A joint RFT and DPO framework aligns the model with business objectives beyond distribution matching. Experiments show UniRec outperforms the strongest baseline by +22.6% HR@50 overall and +15.5% on high-value orders, with online A/B tests confirming significant business metric gains.

Designing Reliable LLM-Assisted Rubric Scoring for Constructed Responses: Evidence from Physics Exams

Student responses in STEM assessments are often handwritten and combine symbolic expressions, calculations, and diagrams, creating substantial variation in format and interpretation. Despite their importance for evaluating students' reasoning, such responses are time-consuming to score and prone to rater inconsistency, particularly when partial credit is required. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have increased attention to AI-assisted scoring, yet evidence remains limited regarding how rubric design and LLM configurations influence reliability across performance levels. This study examined the reliability of AI-assisted scoring of undergraduate physics constructed responses using GPT-4o. Twenty authentic handwritten exam responses were scored across two rounds by four instructors and by the AI model using skill-based rubrics with differing levels of analytic granularity. Prompting format and temperature settings were systematically varied. Overall, human-AI agreement on total scores was comparable to human inter-rater reliability and was highest for high- and low-performing responses, but declined for mid-level responses involving partial or ambiguous reasoning. Criterion-level analyses showed stronger alignment for clearly defined conceptual skills than for extended procedural judgments. A more fine-grained, checklist-based rubric improved consistency relative to holistic scoring. These findings indicate that reliable AI-assisted scoring depends primarily on clear, well-structured rubrics, while prompting format plays a secondary role and temperature has relatively limited impact. More broadly, the study provides transferable design recommendations for implementing reliable LLM-assisted scoring in STEM contexts through skill-based rubrics and controlled LLM settings.

Development, Evaluation, and Deployment of a Multi-Agent System for Thoracic Tumor Board

Tumor boards are multidisciplinary conferences dedicated to producing actionable patient care recommendations with live review of primary radiology and pathology data. Succinct patient case summaries are needed to drive efficient and accurate case discussions. We developed a manual AI-based workflow to generate patient summaries to display live at the Stanford Thoracic Tumor board. To improve on this manually intensive process, we developed several automated AI chart summarization methods and evaluated them against physician gold standard summaries and fact-based scoring rubrics. We report these comparative evaluations as well as our deployment of the final state automated AI chart summarization tool along with post-deployment monitoring. We also validate the use of an LLM as a judge evaluation strategy for fact-based scoring. This work is an example of integrating AI-based workflows into routine clinical practice.

R3-VAE: Reference Vector-Guided Rating Residual Quantization VAE for Generative Recommendation

Generative Recommendation (GR) has gained traction for its merits of superior performance and cold-start capability. As the vital role in GR, Semantic Identifiers (SIDs) represent item semantics through discrete tokens. However, current techniques for SID generation based on vector quantization face two main challenges: (i) training instability, stemming from insufficient gradient propagation through the straight-through estimator and sensitivity to initialization; and (ii) inefficient SID quality assessment, where industrial practice still depends on costly GR training and A/B testing. To address these challenges, we propose Reference Vector-Guided Rating Residual Quantization VAE (R3-VAE). This framework incorporates three key innovations: (i) a reference vector that functions as a semantic anchor for the initial features, thereby mitigating sensitivity to initialization; (ii) a dot product-based rating mechanism designed to stabilize the training process and prevent codebook collapse; and (iii) two SID evaluation metrics, Semantic Cohesion and Preference Discrimination, serving as regularization terms during training. Empirical results on six benchmarks demonstrate that R3-VAE outperforms state-of-the-art methods, achieving an average improvement of 14.2% in Recall@10 and 15.5% in NDCG@10 across three Amazon datasets. Furthermore, we perform GR training and online A/B tests on Toutiao. Our method achieves a 1.62% improvement in MRR and a 0.83% gain in StayTime/U versus baselines. Additionally, we employ R3-VAE to replace the item ID of CTR model, resulting in significant improvements in content cold start by 15.36%, corroborating the strong applicability and business value in industry-scale recommendation scenarios.

SOLARIS: Speculative Offloading of Latent-bAsed Representation for Inference Scaling

Recent advances in recommendation scaling laws have led to foundation models of unprecedented complexity. While these models offer superior performance, their computational demands make real-time serving impractical, often forcing practitioners to rely on knowledge distillation-compromising serving quality for efficiency. To address this challenge, we present SOLARIS (Speculative Offloading of Latent-bAsed Representation for Inference Scaling), a novel framework inspired by speculative decoding. SOLARIS proactively precomputes user-item interaction embeddings by predicting which user-item pairs are likely to appear in future requests, and asynchronously generating their foundation model representations ahead of time. This approach decouples the costly foundation model inference from the latency-critical serving path, enabling real-time knowledge transfer from models previously considered too expensive for online use. Deployed across Meta's advertising system serving billions of daily requests, SOLARIS achieves 0.67% revenue-driving top-line metrics gain, demonstrating its effectiveness at scale.

WiseOWL: A Methodology for Evaluating Ontological Descriptiveness and Semantic Correctness for Ontology Reuse and Ontology Recommendations

The Semantic Web standardizes concept meaning for humans and machines, enabling machine-operable content and consistent interpretation that improves advanced analytics. Reusing ontologies speeds development and enforces consistency, yet selecting the optimal choice is challenging because authors lack systematic selection criteria and often rely on intuition that is difficult to justify, limiting reuse. To solve this, WiseOWL is proposed, a methodology with scoring and guidance to select ontologies for reuse. It scores four metrics: (i) Well-Described, measuring documentation coverage; (ii) Well-Defined, using state-of-the-art embeddings to assess label-definition alignment; (iii) Connection, capturing structural interconnectedness; and (iv) Hierarchical Breadth, reflecting hierarchical balance. WiseOWL outputs normalized 0-10 scores with actionable feedback. Implemented as a Streamlit app, it ingests OWL format, converts to RDF Turtle, and provides interactive visualizations. Evaluation across six ontologies, including the Plant Ontology (PO), Gene Ontology (GO), Semanticscience Integrated Ontology (SIO), Food Ontology (FoodON), Dublin Core (DC), and GoodRelations, demonstrates promising effectiveness.